Monday. 100 days of campaigning to go…..
The sun rose to the monstrous crowing of the Unionists’ pet
parrot, The Herald, announcing that
the three main Westminster parties were
really, absolutely for certain, on the brink of getting round to talking about fixing
a date to make a pact to consider jointly “guaranteeing” the Scottish
Parliament more powers.
Naturally, they couldn’t tell Scottish voters in advance what
these powers would be, though we were welcome to check with any friends who
happened to own a Tardis. Otherwise we’d
have to wait for each party’s version of the powers to be a nice surprise in
its 2015 UK General Election manifesto, like finding a fluffy Werther’s
Original on an otherwise nondescript carpet.
The general message was clear: they think some folk will swallow anything.
Just
down the road, Better Together staff were complaining about some tired old
busker churning through a limited repertoire and making it impossible for them
to concentrate. Unfortunately, this
turned out to be Alistair Darling, plucked from the naughty step to re-launch BT’s "100 Lies in 100 Days" initiative after the original choice, a hotdog salesman
made out of Lego, had unexpectedly been forced to cancel. Coincidentally, it was BT’s annual “Bring A
Friend To Work, Using Threats Or Blackmail If Necessary” day, so there was a
good crowd once the TV companies had sussed where to place their cameras.
Darling
may be Horlicks on legs, but no amount of sleepiness could obscure the true
message of his speech, which ran along the lines of, “I compared Salmond to
Kim Jong Il, for pity’s sake! What do I
have to do to get sacked from this damn campaign? I could be hoovering up directorships in the
City, courtesy of all the complete bastards I forgot to regulate properly, so
why do I need this hassle?”
It
soon transpired that, in a daring attempt to snaffle the moral high ground,
Better Together had adopted the tactic of politeness, replacing their usual gruff
“Naw” with a perfectly behaved “No Thanks”, as if you’d offered them one
cucumber sandwich too many. Apparently the
Saatchi agency’s original suggestions, “Regrettably Too Wee, Too Poor, Too
Stupid” and “I’m Most Awfully Sorry, But Salmond Is A Big Fat Expletive Deleted”,
hadn’t fitted on the wee flags they were handing out.
But
scarcely had the first flag been waved in the face of a passing TV crew than
the whole “No, Thanks” shtick was turned on its head. Yes supporters on Twitter swiftly observed
that a #NoThanks hashtag could equally be applied to the bedroom tax, Trident, biased
broadcasters, unelected governments and every other foul whiff emanating from
Westminster. Once their keyboards
started clattering, a full-scale Twitter drubbing was inevitable. Sorry, BT, it’s #NoThanks to negativity, even
if you express it like a maiden aunt.
Meanwhile,
a sack of potatoes which had previously appeared to be sulking in a corner turned
out to be Gordon Brown, who’s treating the referendum debate as some form of
Hokey Cokey. Reliable mathematicians,
none of whom worked for the Treasury on his watch, estimate that he’s now on
his 49th “decisive entry” into the No campaign.
Since what he says about pensions shows no grasp whatsoever of reality,
and he’s so off-message he might as well be speaking in pictograms, it’s hard
to escape the conclusion that he’s doing this just to piss off Alistair Darling.
The
journalist chosen as the conduit for Gordon’s world-view was Sky’s Eamonn
Holmes, who duly questioned him with all the rigour of a fuzzy-felt cannon
firing cotton wool balls. You don’t want
to annoy Gordon, who is fairly handy with a Blackberry from ten yards, but it turned out that Alex
Salmond had earned his wrath by unfurling a Saltire to celebrate Andy Murray’s
win at Wimbledon. It made Scotland seem
small, reckoned Mr Brown. Goodness knows
what he thinks when he sees the BBC weather map. Or, indeed, the shockingly low life
expectancy in parts of Glasgow after 13 years of farting about by the Blair and
Brown administrations.
However,
the conversation became juicier when Gordy turned his thunderous glare on
the Better Together campaign, which he lambasted - just
as normal people might! - for being negative, patronising and bullying. Coming from him, that’s sufficient provocation
to send the Darling blood pressure skywards until the poor man erupts in a
shower of phlegm and rivets.
Finally,
having left muddy footprints all over the hearthrug, Gordy proceeded to piss on
the Sunday roast by suggesting that David Cameron should debate with Alex
Salmond. Number 10 instantly dismissed
the idea with casual loftiness, making it obvious that in secret the PM and his
advisers were chewing the carpet. Meanwhile,
a high-pitched squeal reported in the Blythswood Square area was identified as air escaping from Better Together’s news management strategy. Or Blair McDougall having a tantrum. Or both.
What
can it all mean? Has Mr Brown, in his
own eyes something of a super-hero, now concluded that the lesser beings can’t
cope with the referendum, so he must take on the mantle of The Man Who Saved
The Union? If so, the campaign could
become very interesting. For, before he
can save something, he must first destroy it….
No comments:
Post a Comment